killoarrow.blogg.se

1. DXO FILMPACK 5 ELITE EDITION SOFT MANUAL
2. DXO FILMPACK 5 ELITE EDITION SOFT FULL
3. DXO FILMPACK 5 ELITE EDITION SOFT SOFTWARE

Thanks for the feedback, and I hope this conversation is not only being read by customers but by DxO staff as well.Īs said before, there is nothing wrong about offering specialised software for e. Pureraw is for those who use dxopl as batch application

DXO FILMPACK 5 ELITE EDITION SOFT FULL

V5 seems to lost the momentum but under the hood there is many improvement hidden.įighting lightroom for customers means going full feathers spread out like a peacock. V4? Deepprime and HCL fase 2 saved the bell. Stil i was convinced of the fact that DxO got it right. No cloning no control of sourceplace just aim and fail until it was on target. Not on par in all aspects of my old sp5pro? Geesh do you remember the “repairtool” it was all or nothing. (at that time you could test for ever even when 30 day’s where gone, only export was watermarked) getting to know the plusses and con’s of the different packages and attached price tags.ĭecided suite elite was THE only way to swap, to jump trains properly.Įxpensive? Yes. Then i tested elite plv1 and added viewpoint and Filmpack elite in testing trail.

DXO FILMPACK 5 ELITE EDITION SOFT MANUAL

Got blown away by the optical module, i believe it had manual prespectivetools. So i found the free version of last dxo optical thingy v9 esential only HQ no prime. Any way i tested Lightroom’s prespective tool chamber and was rather confused, the automodes was very difficult to got “natural looking”. The quest to find it and get skilled to use it properly costed a few months. Horizontal shift, vertikal shift, pincushion, you name it, it was there… Hidden. When i was searching for a replacement of my old silkypix 5pro i was rather impressed by the prespective correction capability’s of silkypix.Īll manual and angle by angle. I think for those people pureraw is developed.

The GUI in that area, which is probably the one people spend most time with, could be much clearer and easier to use in terms of graphic elements.Īs I said I’m really excited about many aspects in PhotoLab, but at the end of the day I’m afraid I will not be purchasing PhotoLab due to the problems mentioned above.īelieve it or not, Peter, not everyone who owns PhotoLab Elite is even interested in the features of Viewpoint and FilmPack.

And it does not help the overall clarity. At least on my high-res 28 inch display, set to 150 % scaling on MacOS and perfectly fine for all other applications, some controls tend to be almost hard to use. The Raw development palettes on the right appear a bit too tiny in part. I fully understand the separate purchase of a specialized application like Nik Silver Efex Pro, but I’m having trouble to understand why PhotoLab doesn’t even offer the most essential b&w tools like a channel mixer to simulate red or blue color filters. Anyway, in total I am not quite convinced.ĭo I really need to purchase an extra piece of software just to make horizontal and vertical perspective corrections which are needed an almost every photo? You must be kidding, sorry.īlack and white conversion: PhotoLab does not seem to offer anything here, which is quite a bummer when seeing things from the Lightroom point of view.

I’ve been trying PhotoLab 5 during the last couple of days in order to finally find an alternative for Lightroom, and I would like to share my opinion in short.įirst of all, I do appreciate many, many things in DxO, and I really enjoyed the workflow when developing Raw files.